Tesla's transition from electric vehicles to humanoid robotics is encountering significant technical and labor challenges. While CEO Elon Musk has positioned the Optimus robot as a cornerstone of the company's future, reports from The Information indicate difficulties in scaling production and meeting development goals.
PLUS ULTRAイーロン・マスクTeslaOptimus
Tesla Faces Production Hurdles and Worker Resistance in Optimus Development
PLUS ULTRA by Amenoyomi
Manufacturing Optimus V3 has proven difficult due to equipment misalignment and production line speed limitations. The assembly process remains labor-intensive; workers must manually assemble robotic hands and forearms containing over 100 small components. Furthermore, issues with component reliability have emerged, such as unreliable touch sensors in the robot's hands, leading Tesla to develop replaceable sensor layers.
The development of general-purpose capabilities also faces hurdles. Current Optimus units reportedly require programming for specific tasks within controlled environments rather than operating autonomously in diverse settings.
The reliance on imitation learning—where robots learn by observing human movements—has created tension among staff. Tesla has utilized workers in Texas and California to wear specialized suits to record physical movements for data collection. However, some employees have reportedly resisted this task, fearing the robots are being trained to replace them. In response, Tesla has shifted some data collection responsibilities to dedicated teams and established "training hubs."
Tesla's efforts arrive amidst intense global competition, with companies in China, Japan, and South Korea developing similar technologies, and competitors like Hyundai planning large-scale deployments of Boston Dynamics' Atlas robots.
PLUS ULTRAby Amenoyomi
The friction in Optimus's production stems from the fundamental difference between specialized industrial arms and general-purpose humanoid hands. While traditional robots perform fixed tasks, achieving human-like dexterity requires an intricate assembly of over 100 small components, including various screws. This complexity necessitates manual assembly by human workers, which slows production and increases the likelihood of errors. Such reliability issues are evident in the failure of touch sensors, prompting Tesla to develop a replaceable sensor glove to avoid the cost of replacing entire robot hands.
These challenges extend to how these robots acquire general-purpose skills through imitation learning. To collect the necessary visual and physical data, Tesla required factory workers in Texas and California to wear specialized suits that record their movements. This specific training method created a direct psychological conflict, as employees felt they were effectively educating the machines designed to replace them. This resistance forced Tesla to move data collection away from general staff toward dedicated teams and specialized training hubs.
These internal struggles are compounded by a contradictory supply chain and intensifying global competition. Despite U.S. government efforts to boost domestic production and FCC bans on certain foreign-made robots, Tesla remains reliant on Chinese suppliers for various components. This dependency persists while competitors such as Toyota and Hyundai—the latter planning to deploy up to 25,000 Boston Dynamics Atlas robots—accelerate their own humanoid programs, increasing the pressure to resolve manufacturing bottlenecks.
Sources
- Tesla workers balk at training Optimus humanoid robots as replacements (Ars Technica AI, 2026-09-25)