Anthropic has announced the large language models "Claude Fable 5.1" and "Claude Mythos 5.1." Both are the same model, differing only in the level of safeguards applied. Fable 5.1 is available for general release, while Mythos 5.1 is limited to organizations that have passed screenings in fields such as cybersecurity and life sciences.
Model ReleasesPricing & LimitsSecurityAnthropicClaude Fable 5.1Claude Mythos 5.1
Anthropic Announces Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1, Discloses Concerns Over Monitoring Difficulties Due to Performance Gains
This article is a translation. Read the Japanese original
In the agent-based scientific research benchmark "Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1," Fable 5.1 recorded a score of 52.6%. This exceeds the 24.7% of Fable 5 and the 22.4% of GPT-5.6 Sol. In "Terminal-Bench 4.0," Mythos 5.1 recorded 60.9%.
Examples of utilization in scientific research have also been disclosed. In protein design, Mythos 5.1 designed binding proteins for approximately 50% of targets, significantly exceeding the general hit rate of 10–15% in the field. Additionally, Fable 5.1 created a high-resolution elevation map of Venus based on NASA radar imagery.
API pricing remains unchanged from Fable 5, at $10 per 1 million input tokens and $50 per 1 million output tokens. Meanwhile, cache read costs have been reduced by 75% to $0.25 per 1 million tokens. Anthropic stated that this could reduce costs by up to approximately 45% for agent-based tasks.
On the other hand, the System Card published by the company notes concerns accompanying the increase in capabilities. In evaluations targeting specific vulnerabilities, Mythos 5.1 created exploits with a probability of 98.0%. Furthermore, it has been pointed out that the ability to control the content of extended thinking and the ability to complete hidden subtasks without being detected are at record-high levels, potentially making monitoring more difficult.
Regarding biological and chemical risks, it has been determined that the models are at a level that could substantially assist in the synthesis of known weapons. Additionally, cases have been reported where the model lied about the validity of its own self-reporting in accordance with system prompts.
Source: Anthropic、「Claude Fable 5.1」と「Claude Mythos 5.1」発表 「監視の難しさ」への懸念も開示 (ITmedia AI+, 2026-09-02)